Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Don't you think that there's some sense in listening to what Emilio says, whithout immediately minimizing his arguments, since he has already been at least 4 times more useful to Debian than you were during the last 8 years? - Lucas
I did listen. That is why it was obvious to me that he was promoting having less eyes review an application. By your metric, he is "at least 4 times more useful to Debian" but I can choose my own metric. I think quality is more important than quantity (in most instances). If your argument for quantity was the standard, Sven Luther would be honored for all his contributions to our mailing lists. In 2001 I was in the NM queue with Eray and it taught me that at times it is best to mind your own little contribution without pushing to correct the 'flaws in the system.' From the perspective of a person more concerned about their own contributions, it was logically significant that "Lack of people vociferously objecting does not imply consent." It may be useless by your standards, but I will now go back to my silent contribution mode. Richard