Richard Hecker wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> No, what is bureaucratic is having to wait one month for FD to review one >> application, just to say `hey it's complete`, and pass it to the DAM. >> Then wait >> another month. I don't see the point in it being reviewed twice if FD >> has no say >> in the final decision and his only task is to check that everything is >> complete. > > In this community, do you really want to suggest we have too many > eyes looking for problems? Do you want to re-review all the GNOME packages before we upload them to the archive? Do you want to re-review the packages that go through the NEW queue after the ftpmasters approve them? Then why do you want two teams looking at new applicants? Emilio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature