Re: DAM and NEW queues processing
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: DAM and NEW queues processing
- From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:04:29 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090701150429.GD16344@kunpuu.plessy.org>
- In-reply-to: <20090625011635.GC9366@kunpuu.plessy.org>
- References: <20090623110557.GD4706@patate.is-a-geek.org> <slrnh41e1k.720.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com> <87prcu6g8a.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20090623194446.GA31905@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <87ws72qtol.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <8763elwzc1.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87hby54hv5.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20090625004709.GB9366@kunpuu.plessy.org> <87iqilunvw.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20090625011635.GC9366@kunpuu.plessy.org>
Le Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:16:35AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:02:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> >
> > I think it's clear from the copyright files already in the archive and
> > that are accepted daily by ftpmaster that listing the individual files
> > is unnecessary if you have all of the licenses accounted for (and
> > potentially copyright notices, which are the main topic of current
> > disagreement). I do agree with you that having that written down
> > somewhere would be good, though.
>
> For the copyright notices, I propose to study the most common licenses
> (typically, the ones who would get their abbriged name standardised in DEP5)
> and make a table that summarises their requirements on that issue. That work
> could take place on the debian-legal mailing list, for instance.
>
> With a good summary of the situation, I think that we will have more chances
> to reach a consensus on this list or debian-devel, whithout generating too
> much messages that would turn people out of the discussion.
Hi all,
I started a documentation effort on debian-legal:
http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20090701145728.GC16344@kunpuu.plessy.org
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: