On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:49:35PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > Concrete proposal: max(Q, 20) endorsements, two existing members
> > together can veto. The veto can be done anonymously via the Debian
> > Account Manager to avoid peer pressure to not veto. The DAM only
> > counts the endorsements and vetos, and does not make judgement calls.
> > All endorsements and vetos must happen within 30 days.
>
> I think max (Q, 20) is a high number, maybe max (Q, 10) ?
> And as well, 2 person vetoing seems like a small number, maybe 4 or 5?
I see a significant flaw here.
If endorsement is bound to Q, than veto shall be bound to Q as well.
I don't see way one should and the other shouldn't.
Most generally, I think that each time we write down numbers of people
which are implicitly assumed to represent a fraction of Debian project
members, those numbers should always be bound to Q.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è sempre /oo\ All one has to do is hit the right
uno zaino -- A.Bergonzoni \__/ keys at the right time -- J.S.Bach
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature