pe, 2008-10-24 kello 16:56 +0200, Wouter Verhelst kirjoitti: > If you insist. Note that I'll vote against it -- I've never liked > procedures whose sole purpose is to change procedures. For what it's worth, as one of the three people who suggested DEP in the first place, I would be unhappy to see it made mandatory, and would vote against a GR suggesting it. As far as I care, DEP should be a tool, for those who wish to use it.