Re: Developer Status
On Thu, Oct 23 2008, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Joerg nominated teams, not persons.
> My "and the people involved" should be read as
> "and the number of teams involved".
I don't think "nominated" is the correct term here. Joerg did
not nominate the secretary for anything, as far as I can tell.
> The number of teams increment the bureaucracy (changing
> the proposal, coordination), and doesn't fit the Debian
> structure (role [proposers] vs. hierarchical [proposal]).
Huh? The people Joerg talked to were people who would be
affected by the proposal. For example, the secretary was called in to
comment since this proposal would require changes in the coting
pmechnism, and I was invited to give feedback on how big a change that
Also, he watned to ask about the constitutionality of the
I don't see how this solicitation of early feedback in any way
adds to the bureaucratic angle.
Just about every computer on the market today runs Unix, except the Mac
(and nobody cares about it). -- Bill Joy 6/21/85
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C