Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: [DM becoming a reality without notifying the project] > I've been more low-key (and hesitant) about implementing this than > I would've liked to have been in order to try to avoid offending the > people who're worried about this, but I should probably have expected > those to find fault with this no matter what happens anyway. Yeah, because promising to tell people about what you do and then not doing that is really not a "fault". We should all applaud you for this great display of your willingness to avoid offending people. > For amusement's sake, correlating GR votes with respondents in this > thread up until now: [...] > V: 21 he Marc Brockschmidt [...] OMFG! I was concerned that the proposal would end up like most of your projects, now it did and you can still be amused that I'm not happy about the outcome? Dude, please start getting actual arguments. You haven't answered to Joerg's initial questions, which basically are an elaborate form of "Why the fuck do you care to create rules if you break them as soon as possible?" - I really wonder about the answer! Could it be that you simply don't care about the opinion of other developers and have just added these safeguards in the GR to calm the worries of the people who you needed to support a constitutional resolution to work around the DAM's and the rest of the ftp-master team's resistance? Marc -- BOFH #135: You put the disk in upside down.
Attachment:
pgpUbviiahUH8.pgp
Description: PGP signature