Re: Multi-winner elections, soc-ctte
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
> Whether A is "free software" and B is "our users" or vice-versa is left as
> an exercise for the reader. ;) Other plausible scenarios might involve
> soc-ctte candidates promoting "freedom of speech" versus "improving
> signal:noise".
Or "melting pot to a common culture" vs. "different cultures in
different parts of the project".
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: