Re: Another level of agression ?

[Richard Hecker <gr8birds@qnet.com>]

Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:03:29PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
>   
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> >     
> > > > After some more pressure on IRC, your commit access has been restored.
> > > >         
> > > It is not enough, i want the suspension revoked, since it was a stupid
> > > decision, which has achieved nothing except worsen the situation, and
> > > was taken contrary to the DAMs procedure, and in a shady and mysterious
> > > way.
> > >       
> > Oh come on Sven!  This thread was about the accidential removal of your
> > kernel team commit access.  It has been restored since them.  The problem
> > is fixed.
> >     
>
> The wider problem has been there since marsch last year or so, and it
> was never fixed.
>
>   
And I am beginning to wonder if it ever can be fixed!
...<snip>...
> So, what will be done to solve this issue, or should it be left open
> like a bleeding wound to fester and worsen so much longer ? Isn't it
> time to solve this in a fair and human way, like it should have been
> done last year ? And no, you cannot blame Anthony Towns for all the evil
> this time around.
>
>   
It seems to me that there is plenty of blame to go around. I
accept my fair share for everything I have written that has just
prolonged the debate. But when a simple accident (removal of
access) blows up into a rehash of all the accusations that should
have died long ago, it looks like Sven will never let go of this
issue.

I do not mean to troll, but I do have a serious rhetorical question
I would like you to consider. Sven has said "It is not enough." So,
what is enough? I do not see total abdication as a viable option.
It may take two to argue, but one can rehash previous disagreements
endlessly.

Richard