also sprach Ana Guerrero <ana@ekaia.org> [2006.10.11.1040 +0200]: > Yeah, but this frustration is not only about be able to upload > your own packages, this is also about, i.e., have rights to vote > in the currents GR. Exactly. So why not work towards a scheme where you can have vote and private access, but not write access to the archive if not needed? Contributions like translations and other package-overarching changes are much better done in a centralised fashion (see debtags). But anyway, from a furious discussion on #debian.de I want to make sure that you don't read my mail as anything other than what it was supposed to be: - my own opinion - not a criticism of NM or a hint that I know how to improve it - a suggestion to assign more granular rights to people according to what they need to accomplish their tasks in Debian, not as a way to reward someone or to separate the full DDs from the half DDs. - an expression of my desire to do something about inactive DDs who all have write rights to the project. But this has all been discussed. I shall tend to the etch release now. This is definitely material for afterwards. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems NP: The Cooper Temple Clause / See This Through And Leave
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)