On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:51:02PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > I think that's the very case where we need the time to examine the > private vetting process, since there may be no external communication > before the announcement. Why wouldn't we just have a public vetting process that takes two weeks or more anyway? There are some cases where it makes sense to approve funds discretely (for legal issues, or in consideration of people's personal situation), but for vetting organisations, what's the point in rushing it or doing it behind closed doors? Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature