Re: Reforming the NM process
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I strongly disagree that 2.3 is a long-term thing. It should be
> started years ago, but it isn't too late yet. We should push it with a
> transition plan in mind (e.g: what we're going to do with the people
> that is already waiting for DAM?), but the transition couldn't require
> (more) work before applying, IMHO. We should block not really
> interested people giving less privileges for those who do less as you
> pointed out and be good with MIA and its procedures. I step in to help
> writing a 1-year transition plan and contact the people that needs to
> accept/reject some points, if you want.
I don't understand what you have written. Can you reformulate it ?
A long term plan can happen shortly if someone does it, but the change
mentionned in 2.3 involve many people and as thus will required a great
deal of coordination work.
That's why Mark called it "long term" IMO. But with Anthony's recent blog post,
I'm sure we'll start going into this direction.
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :