On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:23:04AM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 08:23 +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:12:12PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:19:55PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > > > > That means that as of now, uol.com.br are now considered spam addresses > > > > and anyone with that address (uol.com.br) has now been unceremoniously > > > > unsubscribed[1]. > > > > > > I am still receiving those obnoxious messages in response to my posts to > > > debian-user. > > > > Thanks for the information Matthew, that narrows it down to 475 > > candidate addresses. However we never anticipated that unsubscribing > > uol.com.br subscribers would rectify the problem -- esepecially > > immediately. > > You're assuming that it's someone subscribed with the same address to > debian-devel and debian-user. True - I don't think it is an unreasonable starting point though. I'd certainly be surprised if there was more than one account forwarding to petsupermarket. On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:31:26AM +1100, Pascal Hakim wrote: > > And you're also assuming it's someone who's subscribed rather than > someone reading the list through a gateway. I'd already begun a dialog with some of those gateways to see what we can do about uol.com.br together. Anand -- `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature