On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On 12/15/05, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:06:51PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:57:12PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > > I don't disagree. I would much rather every ubuntu change had a > > > > corresponding patch filed in the BTS, > > > > > > Every "relevant" change put into the BTS would be nice, yes. Filing > > > > Notice that it is official ubuntu directive to *NOT* do that, that is to not > > send patches directly to the BTS, > > Please give a reference to this directive. I am part of the MOTU team, > and have never heared about such a directive. Hmm. I'm pretty sure I've read it in a couple of places, but I've definitely heard it from several Canonical employees -- I recall, specifically, having a discussion with Robert Collins on the goods, bads, and otherwises of the idea. He seemed quite familiar with the whole subject. > > Friendly, > > sorry, this is unfriendly distribution of FUD. Aaah, FUD -- the new Godwin. I'd say you've racked up a couple of CoC points there... <grin> - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature