On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote: >Andrew Suffield writes: >>On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:09:16PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: >>>My response is simply this: it's lies. I challenge anybody who >>>thinks otherwise to present evidence. >> >>So far (three days) we've had one person try, and give up after I >>explained every case. I think that says a lot for the accuracy of the >>accusations. > >It says a lot more about how much you regularly misrepresent plain >writing to put your spin on issues. You think you rebutted my >arguments; I think you actually illustrated that I was correct from >the start. The real reason I gave up is that it is clear that neither >of us is convincing the other. > >Descending to your flawed level of rhetoric, What are the flaws? >it is also telling that nobody else has stepped up to argue that >your posts were acceptable. Why is that? Is it because asuffield is doing a good job defending himself? Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature