Re: GFDL freedoms
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:56:09PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:22:22PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:51:07PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > > Given the above I don't really see any real difference of a
> > > tarball with a docbook and included pictures/graphs/,... and an
> > > Openoffice doc. Why on earth would we want to exclude openoffice
> > > docs (provided that the contents is licensed freely?)
> >
> > We don't, that's the whole point. The FDL definition of 'transparent' is
> > so broken that it excludes OOo docs.
>
> How does this affect distributors?
Where did I say it does?
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to: