On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:25:13PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:44:23AM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > That would be a godsend. It would work, too. It's happening already: > > a lot of people run woody as "the stable core" and backports.org > > as "the rest", so the idea certainly has merit. > > I think it has some problems, though -- for instance, differences in > versions of libc. If we supported building packages from source better > (which I really think we should), this instantly becomes more practical. What do you mean "building packages from source better"? What improvements did you have in mind? -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature