Re: Proposed transition plan for non-free and call for help
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 04:02:50PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:29:58AM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> > Michael Banck wrote:
> > > once non-free is removed from debian.org. In fact, we might try to get
> > > non-free.org running even no matter what the outcome of the general
> > > resolution will be, provided maintainers are interested in moving their
> > > packages there.
> >
> > One of the advantages of keeping non-free on the Debian servers is to
> > avoid such a duplication of effort. If results of the current vote
> > reaffirms support for non-free, why would maintainers want to work on
> > such duplication and move packages to the parallel system?
>
> You'd have to ask people actually maintaing non-free packages here. From
> the discussions on -vote, I was under this impression.
Wow, really? -vote is too much noise for me, but I definitely wouldn't
see any reason to move my couple of non-free packages away from
debian.org if the vote goes that way.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: