Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes:
Anthony> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:34:11PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> This is a joint draft message from the release manager and
>> Manoj Srivastava ....
Anthony> The phrase Ian used was "DRAFT joint message", implying that
Anthony> it was a "draft of a (joint message)" open for review. Your
Anthony> phrase is the opposite, implying that it's a "jointly
Anthony> written (draft message)", which it isn't.
I see. So your implication is that merely by transposing the
words joint and draft the message gains legitimacy? And _you_ have
the gall to call _me_ an idiot? Jesus.
Anthony> Why are you proposing to remove all the vi clones from the
Anthony> distribution anyway? What possible reason could you have?
Since they are not derived from the one true editor. Apart
from being a name calling moron, you have no humour gene.
>> hoping I have made my point,
Anthony> That you're an idiot? Well, yes.
I can see just how well this conflict resolution document is
going to be.
The most dangerous food is wedding cake. American proverb
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C