[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Regression in sleep code for PowerBook5,2



On 25/08/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 16:04 +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 24/08/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 11:22 +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> >
> > > How do I test this?
> >
> > Do a lot of them and see if that locks up :)
>
> Just after reading you mail I tried to switch to a text console and
> experinced the lock. The laptop was on for about 10 hours and I had
> been browsing, IRC-ing editing  etc. meanwhile.
>
> What should I do next? :-) Anything I can do to help?

Looks like an X problem to me... what video chip model do you have ?

> > > Does the new kernel needs udev >=0.097-1? I was reluctant to upgrade
> > > to it and stayed at 0.094-? (previous Sid package) because
> > > bluez-bcm203x depends on hotplug, which was provided by the old
> > > version, but not by the new one.
> >
> > No idea.
>
> It seems not. I have now the new udev in spite of the bluetooth
> regression. Hmm, I could roll-back now, until this issue is fixed.
>


0000:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350
[Mobility Radeon 9600 M10] (prog-if 00 [VGA])
       Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10]
       Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
       Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium
TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
       Latency: 255 (2000ns min), Cache Line Size: 32 bytes
       Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 48
       Region 0: Memory at b8000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
       Region 1: I/O ports at f0000400 [size=256]
       Region 2: Memory at b0000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
       Expansion ROM at f1000000 [disabled] [size=128K]
       Capabilities: <access denied>


--
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein

Reply to: