Re: Selinux available on 2.6.10 powerpc.deb [was: powerpc 2.6.10-2 [ ... ]]
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:51:20PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 11:55:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just uploaded the powerpc kernels 2.6.10-2 on :
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.6.10-2/
> >
>
> I only now realised it, after having a look at dmesg:
>
> dmesg | grep -i selin
> SELinux: Disabled at boot.
>
> 2.6.10 has "Selinux" support compiled in. :)
Yes, indeed :
#
# Security options
#
CONFIG_KEYS=y
# CONFIG_KEYS_DEBUG_PROC_KEYS is not set
CONFIG_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y
# CONFIG_SECURITY_ROOTPLUG is not set
CONFIG_SECURITY_SECLVL=m
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=0
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DEVELOP=y
# CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_MLS is not set
I am not sure about this one (or other rarely used options), so i am trying to
follow the x86 kernels on this.
> (Not being sure how new this actually is, as 2.6.10-2 might hint there
> was already a 2.6.10-1 binary available ... )
Indeed, 2.6.10-1 is in NEW since over a week now, that said, it should be the
exact kernel than 2.6.10-2. The only thing that changed was the addition of
the postinst thingy. I really need to copy the kernel-source changelog in the
kernel-image one, or at least mention against which kernel-source it was built
though.
> Congratulations, Debian folks, and both thumbs up for 2.6.10 ... :)
Hehe, thanks,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: