Re: Re : G5 Xserver or Sun Blade 1500
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:04:40AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 03:57:22PM +0100, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > > > I will probably use the -benh tree for future official debian kernels
> > >
> > > Please keep in mind that kernel-patch-benh exists already. You should
> >
> > Well, my plan was to let 2.4.22 stay at the linuxppc tree, jump over
> > 2.4.23, and have 2.4.24 and beyond based on the -benh tree. But has been
> > stopped of doing this by the inability of extracting a clean 2.4.24
> > version of the -benh (or linuxppc for that matter) bitkeeper tree, since
> > nobody actually tagged it properly in the mess that followed the hasty
> > 2.4.24 release. If you like, i would not be adverse to you becoming
> > co-maintainer of the kernel-patch package or something.
>
> What about taking the PPC 2.4.23 tree and applying the 2.4.24 patch, and
> manually fixing the rejects (if any)?
Yeah, i was also thinking of that. I will check if i can find a proper
tag for 2.4.23. Anyway, the patch between 2.4.23 and 2.4.24 is mostly
tiny, since it includes not much more than the security fix.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: