Re: Still seeing if hfsplus is reliable with recent kernels (was: Re: 2-4-21-rc3-benh0 - hfsplus)

To: Rob Latham <rob@terizla.org>, Oliver Ripka <olliwolli@gmx.de>, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Still seeing if hfsplus is reliable with recent kernels (was: Re: 2-4-21-rc3-benh0 - hfsplus)
From: Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola@ic.unicamp.br>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 11:14:05 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 200408081114.16551.rafael.espindola@ic.unicamp.br>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040807213754.GA2234@ime.usp.br>
References: <20030529171047.GA723@olliwolli.de> <20030714161538.GH46499@terizla.org> <[🔎] 20040807213754.GA2234@ime.usp.br>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Em Saturday 07 August 2004 18:37, Rogério Brito escreveu:
> But the compilation still failed near the linking phase (it complained
> about symbols related to jiffies not being found). I don't know what
> could be the cause of the problem, but I suspect that it would have
> something to do with case-sensitiveness.
I does:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2004-06/msg00185.html


Rafael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBFjU0LlrfGJ8JUHwRAjJDAJ4iIctx3mNNqK3DB0RSynrwwqbUwQCgzHLw
x0ElsC7DaRnvpdAPfpzArDE=
=C3V7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Still seeing if hfsplus is reliable with recent kernels (was: Re: 2-4-21-rc3-benh0 - hfsplus)
  - From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>

References:
- Still seeing if hfsplus is reliable with recent kernels (was: Re: 2-4-21-rc3-benh0 - hfsplus)
  - From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>

Prev by Date: javaplugin_oji.so + gcc-3.4.1
Next by Date: SE-Linux packages available
Previous by thread: Still seeing if hfsplus is reliable with recent kernels (was: Re: 2-4-21-rc3-benh0 - hfsplus)
Next by thread: Re: Still seeing if hfsplus is reliable with recent kernels (was: Re: 2-4-21-rc3-benh0 - hfsplus)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread