Re: Sleep problems in kernel 2.6 from mvista.com
> When I do it now it seems to accelerate... it starts slow but becomes
> much faster...
>
> Does that sound like being caused by the anticipated scheduler ?
> What I don't understand is why the cpu is at 100% while it was not with
> 2.4.
You have CONFIG_PREEMPT ? If yes, then don't look further for the
culprit ;)
> > Regarding the fixes, just pick the 2 missing #define's in a tree without
> > my changes ;) I'll fix that asap in my tree.
>
> ah, ok.
>
> Soeren.
--
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Reply to: