Bug#625449: Permanent BSP patch
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 06:57:13AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:22:46PM +0100, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> > Yes. If a maintainer is taking more that for a *RC* bug fix, then they
> > *should* keep the buglog updated with status.
> Talking about the GCC 4.6 “*RC bugs*”, I got one other report telling that
> Debian's GCC 4.6.1 will introduce more failures. Then why do we need to act in
> emergency and fix all the 4.6.0 bugs within 7 days ? Can't you tolerate us to
> collate both transitions, without having to put placeholders bugs in the BTS ?
No. You don't need to fix all the bugs in 7 days, you need to at least
respond to it though.
> I still do not understand why pressure is given to answer in 7 days, which is
> at most one full week-end, for non-urgent issues.
These are RC bugs. They're urgent issues. As for why doing this at all,
please see (again) the URL I pointed to above.
< wjt> THINK OF THE TREES
< rjek> ... THAT WE BURNT TO MAKE THE ELECTRONS TO SEND THIS EMAIL