Bug#548867: Proposed patch to update Debian Developer's Duties chapter
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Bill Allombert wrote:
> As the name imply, this a reference document, not a prescriptive document. It should
> provide technical answer to technical question. Fundamentally it only provides advices.
> Patronizing would be bad form.
Please be specific, can you tell me where in the latest patch there's
"patronizing" in action?
Note that the whole "developer duties" chapter is not new. I'm not
introducing it. And the purpose of the developers-reference has always
been broader than "technical answer to technical question". We have always
had explanations of procedures of how to interact with various teams and
the associated expectations put on the maintainer.
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)