Hi Bill On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:50:03AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:40:30PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 08:06:24PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Package: debian-policy > > > Version: 3.8.4.0 > > > Severity: minor > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I noticed, with the current upload of the debian-policy the file > > > /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz seems to have > > > a broken 'formatting'. E.g. previously we had: > > > > > > * Added parallel=n to the standardized DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS tags, > > > indicating that a package should be built using up to n parallel > > > processes if the package supports it [4.9.1] > > > > > > now we have > > > > > > + *4.9.1*: Added parallel=n to the standardized DEB\_BUILD\_OPTIONS tags, > > > indicating that a package should be built using up to n parallel > > > processes if the package supports it > > > > > > It seems something broke on generation of that. The html variant seems > > > ok. > > > > Hello Salvatore, > > I checked this file before uploading the package but I thought this was > > the expected behavior of the formatter. In any case, I agree this is quite > > ugly and I have converted the org file to debiandoc-sgml which generate > > much nicer text files. > > I created a git branch 'bug567845-ballombe' that change policy to use > upgrading-checklist.sgml. Please comment. Thank you. I will - if I can find some free time for it - have a look at this new git branch. If it generates nicer text files it is great. Do you have already somewhere the generated text file from it? Bests Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature