debian-policy Aug 2004 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Invite
Letha
Important News and Information.
Otto
Coupon for $200 on your first deposit
Dwight Foreman
You will find your best loan with us
M B Smith
Re: Re: Submision result ID: 35157
Toni
Processed: Re: Bug#263448: msttcorefonts: separate directory for non-free fonts, so apps can discourage their use in new documents
Debian Bug Tracking System
RFC: New approach to locales - or - we already use localepurge anyway
Daniel Ruoso
Quarantine Attachments
no-reply
Bug#102213: It should help you look
Marie
Re: really?
confirmation
Reviewed Info at Sat, 07 Aug 2004 02:33:35 -0500
Benny
viarag is $2.38
Lakisha Herriman
Fw: stasis
Coleman Pratt
Bug#264434: debian-policy: set default umask 002 for the user private groups use
Christian Gatzemeier
build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Goswin von Brederlow
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Andreas Metzler
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Andreas Rottmann
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Goswin von Brederlow
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Andreas Rottmann
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Andreas Metzler
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Wouter Verhelst
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Goswin von Brederlow
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Wouter Verhelst
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Goswin von Brederlow
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Wouter Verhelst
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Goswin von Brederlow
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Colin Watson
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Bill Allombert
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Goswin von Brederlow
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Michael Banck
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Goswin von Brederlow
Re: build, build-arch and build-indep targets in debian/rules
Goswin von Brederlow
Error installing Mandrake 10...
dannychina2008
Your Registration
Patricia
Fw: dorchester
Alana Murphy
software
uwsg
Re: your request
Elkins
Re: Re: Mail Server
no-reply
failure notice
ssorrells
Remodel the kitchen.
R M Jackson
Bug#265593: debian-policy: LOGNAME vs. USER
Dan Jacobson
Bug#265593: marked as done (debian-policy: LOGNAME vs. USER)
Debian Bug Tracking System
will make you feel like 21 again
Noemi Dresel
need a hug?
Christine Lackey
she said you rpaed her
Bradly Taylor
Logo I use on my site, I want to be sure it doesn't offend, or violate policy.
Doug Riddle
Re: Logo I use on my site, I want to be sure it doesn't offend, or violate policy.
Aaron M. Ucko
Home is where the heart is
Abraham Sherwood
Fw: treetop
Kaye Cochran
Re-Fi and save
Sonia W
Unidentified subject!
secretary
Re: Mail Delivery (failure no-reply@dreamnex.com)
no-reply
Redo the master?
L. B. Lewis
Re: To clarify the situation
Damien Daugherty
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Bill Allombert
Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Thomas Bushnell BSG
i've had eonugh of your bluslhit
Norman Hicks
Fw: explode
Sheila Cormier
9.4 & Restarting Multiple Daemons
ms419
Re: 9.4 & Restarting Multiple Daemons
Julian Gilbey
Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep (was: Bug#256141: addresses: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1)
Andreas Barth
Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep (was: Bug#256141: addresses: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1)
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep
Andreas Barth
Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep
Steve Langasek
Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep
Brent Fulgham
Re: [pkg-GNUstep-maintainers] Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep
Bill Allombert
Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep (was: Bug#256141: addresses: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1)
Sebastian Ley
Re: Bug#218893: Autodetecting existence of build-arch target
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#239498: debian-policy: absolute/relative paths for files included/referenced in configuration files
Manoj Srivastava
Message not available
Bug#239498: marked as done (debian-policy: absolute/relative paths for files included/referenced in configuration files)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#222779: marked as done (debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] deb specifications and signed debs extension)
Debian Bug Tracking System
This is not a policy issue
Manoj Srivastava
Processed: This is not a policy issue
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#246016: Define allowed charsets properly
Manoj Srivastava
CVS srivasta: Added a section about guidelines for policy changes to the policy
Debian Policy CVS
CVS srivasta: Added mention of doc-base as the recomendded means for registering documentation.
Debian Policy CVS
CVS srivasta: Added do-base recommendation
Debian Policy CVS
Fw: intolerant
Rob Mejia
CVS srivasta: Document uploaders field
Debian Policy CVS
Re: Having read what had
Antoine
When Re-fi-nance makes sense
Kurt D. Wilson
<Possible follow-ups>
When Re-fi-nance makes sense
L Moore
Re: dokument
citywebteam
Term of your subscription N81-2-26 expires
Erna Mcintyre
Re: Mail Delivery (failure)
chainsaw
Inkjet and Laser Cartridges ~ Save up to 75%
Printer Supplies
For Zapata's Shop Customers!
Sabrina Bell
For Brandon's Shop Customers!
Lenny Russell
For Graham's Shop Customers!
Lyman Salter
Bug#268777: debian-policy: the underground "url" field in package descriptions
Dan Jacobson
Bug#268777: marked as done (debian-policy: the underground "url" field in package descriptions)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#268777: debian-policy: the underground "url" field in package descriptions
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Processed: Having a URL field sounds like a best practices kinda thing
Debian Bug Tracking System
The last update was on 07:47 GMT Sat Mar 08. There are 103 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc