debian-policy Jan 2004 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
[no subject]
[PROPOSAL] Debian should require FHS 2.3 instead of 2.1
And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election
Bug#212434: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade FHS from 2.1 to 2.2
Re: Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Re: Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Bug#225465: (no subject)
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to notstart at boot, via debconf
Bug#226373: Provides: apache
Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10
Bug#228692: Section 9.2.2 UID and GID classes
Bug#230217: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Should update to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard FHS 2.3
debian extensions.
Debian-policy VAiagra!
Exact dependencies and Architecture: all packages
Modern way of losing Orientals we;ght natural scantier
Someone just started to research you.
Undelivered mail: test
The last update was on 06:55 GMT Mon May 20. There are 47 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc