debian-policy Jan 2004 by date

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Jan 02

Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf Dan Jacobson

Jan 03

Re: Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability Tore Anderson

Jan 04

Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability Chris Waters

Jan 05

Bug#225465: (no subject) Dan Jacobson
Bug#225465: (no subject) Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Jan 06

Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf Thomas Hood
Bug#226373: Provides: apache Brian Minton
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf Josip Rodin

Jan 07

Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf Josip Rodin
And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election Xan
Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election Colin Watson
Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election Scott James Remnant
Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election Manoj Srivastava
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf Thomas Hood

Jan 08

Re: Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability Tore Anderson

Jan 09

Re: Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability Wouter Verhelst

Jan 10

Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election Przemyslaw Brojewski
Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election Paul E Condon
Re: And next name after Sarge? or PROPOSAL for Codenames' election Bryan Allen

Jan 11

Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to notstart at boot, via debconf Thomas Hood

Jan 12

Modern way of losing Orientals we;ght natural scantier Debian-policy

Jan 13

[no subject] Büffel

Jan 14

Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10 Mark Janssen
Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10 Matthias Urlichs

Jan 15

Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10 Chris Waters
Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10 Daniel B.
Re: Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10 Hubert Chan
Re: Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10 Paul E Condon
Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10 Chris Waters

Jan 16

Someone just started to research you. support

Jan 20

Bug#228692: Section 9.2.2 UID and GID classes Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Re: Someone just started to research you. CDieseldor
Bug#212434: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade FHS from 2.1 to 2.2 Tobias Burnus

Jan 21

Re: Bug#227762: Typo / Language in section 3.10 era+debian
Exact dependencies and Architecture: all packages Colin Watson

Jan 22

Re: Exact dependencies and Architecture: all packages Branden Robinson
Re: Exact dependencies and Architecture: all packages Colin Watson
Re: Exact dependencies and Architecture: all packages Branden Robinson

Jan 23

Debian-policy VAiagra! mikhail

Jan 26

debian extensions. prasad
Re: debian extensions. Colin Watson

Jan 27

Re: Exact dependencies and Architecture: all packages Chris Cheney
Re: Exact dependencies and Architecture: all packages Colin Watson

Jan 29

Bug#230217: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Should update to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard FHS 2.3 Tobias Burnus
[PROPOSAL] Debian should require FHS 2.3 instead of 2.1 Tobias Burnus
Undelivered mail: test DrWeb-DAEMON
Re: [PROPOSAL] Debian should require FHS 2.3 instead of 2.1 Bill Allombert

The last update was on 07:47 GMT Sat Mar 08. There are 47 messages. Page 1 of 1.