debian-policy Dec 2003 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Bug#222779: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] deb specifications and signed debs extension
Goswin Brederlow
Bug#222779: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] deb specifications and signed debs extension
dalhagen
Bug#222553: policy 11.5.3 refers to using the menu package to register docs
Joey Hess
Bug#222553: policy 11.5.3 refers to using the menu package to register docs
Bill Allombert
Bug#222553: policy 11.5.3 refers to using the menu package to register docs
Josip Rodin
draft proposal for a new web server policy
Joey Hess
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Daniel Stone
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Joey Hess
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Andrew Suffield
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Joey Hess
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Daniel Stone
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Bill Allombert
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Steve Langasek
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Bill Allombert
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Steve Langasek
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Roland Mas
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Florian Weimer
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Matthew Wilcox
Re: draft proposal for a new web server policy
Ola Lundqvist
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Josip Rodin
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Josip Rodin
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Matt Zimmerman
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Bill Allombert
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Josip Rodin
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Josip Rodin
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Herbert Xu
Bug#222779: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files
Andreas Barth
Bug#222779: Bug#161593: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#222779: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files
Goswin von Brederlow
Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Marc Haber
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Raphael Goulais
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Santiago Vila
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Marc Haber
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Santiago Vila
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Marc Haber
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Paul E Condon
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Andreas Metzler
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Paul E Condon
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Paul E Condon
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Andrew Suffield
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Marc Haber
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Paul E Condon
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Marc Haber
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Bill Allombert
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Bastian Blank
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Anthony Towns
Re: Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Jakob Bohm
Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides
Rene Engelhard
Re: Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides
Julien BLACHE
Re: Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides
Rene Engelhard
Re: Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides
Bill Allombert
Re: Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides
Rene Engelhard
Re: Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides
Rene Engelhard
Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Ardo van Rangelrooij
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Ardo van Rangelrooij
Processed: Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
Bill Allombert
Debian-Policy and FHS 2.1 vs 2.2
Tobias Burnus
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Tore Anderson
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Tore Anderson
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Andrew Suffield
Bug#224509: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Chris Waters
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Tore Anderson
Re: Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#224770: debian-policy: incorrect tar example deb manipulation
Bob Proulx
Bug#224770: debian-policy: incorrect tar example deb manipulation
Josip Rodin
Re: Automated reply
Rita & Al
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
Dan Jacobson
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
John Hasler
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
Will Lowe
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
John Hasler
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
Vincent Bernat
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
Andreas Metzler
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
Josip Rodin
Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug
Mark Brown
Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug
Joey Hess
Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug
Mark Brown
Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug
Junichi Uekawa
Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug
Andreas Metzler
mozilla-* / myspell-* and their Provides: / Suggests:
Rene Engelhard
URI Enclosure in Angled Glyphs
Alexander Winston
Re: URI Enclosure in Angled Glyphs
Colin Watson
Re: URI Enclosure in Angled Glyphs
Alexander Winston
The last update was on 18:36 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 91 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc