debian-policy Dec 2003 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Re: Automated reply
Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy?
Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem]
Bug#222553: policy 11.5.3 refers to using the menu package to register docs
Bug#222779: Bug#161593: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files
Bug#222779: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] deb specifications and signed debs extension
Bug#222779: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files
Bug#224509: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability)
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Bug#224770: debian-policy: incorrect tar example deb manipulation
Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf
Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug
Debian-Policy and FHS 2.1 vs 2.2
draft proposal for a new web server policy
Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides
mozilla-* / myspell-* and their Provides: / Suggests:
Processed: Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice
Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values?
Someone is researching your background
URI Enclosure in Angled Glyphs
The last update was on 06:22 GMT Sun May 31. There are 92 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc