debian-policy Dec 2003 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Re: Automated reply Re: Bad version number based on date advice in policy? Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice Bug#218893: Proposal: debian/rules.version file [Fix for the build-arch problem] Bug#222553: policy 11.5.3 refers to using the menu package to register docs Bug#222779: Bug#161593: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files Bug#222779: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] deb specifications and signed debs extension Bug#222779: [PROPOSAL] definition of deb binary files Bug#224509: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability) Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability Bug#224770: debian-policy: incorrect tar example deb manipulation Bug#225465: debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf Bug#225465: Suggested course of action to close this bug Debian-Policy and FHS 2.1 vs 2.2 draft proposal for a new web server policy Mass bug filing potential: (x-)www-browser Provides mozilla-* / myspell-* and their Provides: / Suggests: Processed: Re: Bug#203098: debian-policy: using <link rel="..."> would be nice Should we allow packages to depend on packages with lower priority values? Someone is researching your background URI Enclosure in Angled Glyphs The last update was on 06:22 GMT Sun May 31. There are 92 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc