debian-policy May 2001 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Bug#95906: debian-policy: Debian policy manual description should mention the packaging manual incorporation
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#95906: debian-policy: Debian policy manual description should mention the packaging manual incorporation
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Bug#95906: debian-policy: Debian policy manual description should mention the packaging manual incorporation
Julian Gilbey
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Taral
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Julian Gilbey
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Processed: Re: Bug#94995: [PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Colin Watson
Processed: Re: Bug#94995: [PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS jdg: * Complete rewrite of sections 9.1 and 9.2 (and a few debiandoc-sgml
debian-policy
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Steve Greenland
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Steve Greenland
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#94827: tktable; Build-Depends: debhelper
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
CVS jdg: * Really install the FHS HTML version this time
debian-policy
CVS jdg: * Added doc-base support for all of the HTML docs in the package
debian-policy
CVS jdg: * And note this in the changelog
debian-policy
CVS jdg: * Small fixes; it seems to work now.
debian-policy
CVS jdg: * Add FHS to doc-base
debian-policy
CVS jdg: * Line up <example>s; should work a little more nicely now (modulo a
debian-policy
CVS jdg: * Forgot to add the FHS doc-base file
debian-policy
CVS jdg:
debian-policy
<Possible follow-ups>
CVS jdg:
debian-policy
CVS jdg: * Added modified debiandoc-sgml formatters to work around some bugs in
debian-policy
[typos] policy.sgml
philippe batailler
Re: [typos] policy.sgml
Julian Gilbey
CVS jdg: * Clean up some of the compact/non-compact stuff
debian-policy
91252 becoming an amendment
Branden Robinson
Processed: 91252 becoming an amendment
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
Anthony Towns
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Branden Robinson
Processed: re-proposing this
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Sam TH
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Matt Zimmerman
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Sam TH
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Sam TH
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Seth Arnold
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Anthony Towns
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Sam TH
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Seth Arnold
Re: Bug#91257: re-proposing this
Julian Gilbey
Must/should/may
Anthony Towns
Re: Must/should/may
Julian Gilbey
Processed: damnit
Debian Bug Tracking System
Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Julian Gilbey
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Julian Gilbey
Re: Tasks policy
Mark Eichin
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Sam Hartman
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Julian Gilbey
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Julian Gilbey
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Julian Gilbey
Re: Tasks policy
Sam Hartman
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Sam Hartman
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Steve Greenland
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Tasks policy
Joey Hess
Re: Tasks policy
Jason Gunthorpe
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Josip Rodin
Processed: Re: Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Richard Braakman
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Josip Rodin
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Richard Braakman
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Josip Rodin
Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.
Branden Robinson
Finishing the FHS transition
Adrian Bunk
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Oliver Elphick
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Chris Waters
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Arthur Korn
menu and FHS (was Re: Finishing the FHS transition)
Chris Waters
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Adrian Bunk
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Steve Greenland
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Julian Gilbey
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Martin Michlmayr
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Chris Waters
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Adrian Bunk
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Anthony Towns
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Adrian Bunk
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Anthony Towns
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Chris Waters
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Anthony Towns
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Seth Arnold
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Joey Hess
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Chris Waters
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Adam Heath
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Adam Heath
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Bas Zoetekouw
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Colin Watson
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Finishing the FHS transition
Torsten Landschoff
Bug#96597: native packages should be required to contain changelogs
Sam Hartman
Bug#96629: 3.2 and 2.3 package naming not synchronized
Egon Willighagen
Special init.d scripts
Julian Gilbey
RE: Special init.d scripts
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: Special init.d scripts
Seth Arnold
Re: Special init.d scripts
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
CVS jdg: * Done chapter 10 now
debian-policy
"Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Branden Robinson
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Herbert Xu
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Herbert Xu
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Herbert Xu
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Herbert Xu
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Seth Arnold
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Herbert Xu
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Herbert Xu
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Herbert Xu
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Josip Rodin
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Anthony Towns
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Manoj Srivastava
Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone?
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#53582: PROPOSAL] base section: let's get rid of this one at last
Joey Hess
Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin
Junichi Uekawa
Message not available
Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin
Junichi Uekawa
Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin
Anand Kumria
Bug#96873: Info received (was virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin
Junichi Uekawa
tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Joey Hess
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Arthur Korn
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Anthony Towns
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Joey Hess
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Branden Robinson
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Joey Hess
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Branden Robinson
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Joey Hess
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Anthony Towns
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Joey Hess
Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation)
Anthony Towns
Use of Debian offical logo
Hisham Ismail
Re: Use of Debian offical logo
Colin Watson
Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)
Adrian Bunk
Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)
Philippe Troin
Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd)
Adrian Bunk
reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller!
Chris Waters
Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller!
Wolfgang Sourdeau
Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller!
Michael Piefel
Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller!
Bernhard R. Link
Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller!
Wolfgang Sourdeau
RE: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller!
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Bug#97072: [PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version
Anthony Towns
Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version
Steve Greenland
Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#97072: make amendment
Anthony Towns
Processed: make amendment
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#97072: make amendment
Anthony Towns
Processed: Re: Bug#97072: make amendment
Debian Bug Tracking System
ATTN: font package maintainers
Branden Robinson
Software Engineers, Software Developers. Opportunity in Luxembourg
Alex Jacobs
Bug#91257: seconding this
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
this proposal becoming an amendment
Branden Robinson
Processed: this proposal becoming an amendment
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#91257: I always forget SOMETHING
Branden Robinson
7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages
Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages
Seth Arnold
Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages
Brian May
Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages
Julian Gilbey
Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin
Brian White
Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin
Peter Palfrader
Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Adrian Bunk
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Julian Gilbey
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Marco d'Itri
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Julian Gilbey
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Santiago Vila
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Junichi Uekawa
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Richard Braakman
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
John Galt
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Richard Braakman
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Steve Greenland
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Adrian Bunk
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Colin Watson
Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries?
Adrian Bunk
CVS jdg: * Improved 10.1.2 example (fixes bug#92744)
debian-policy
CVS jdg: * Improving 11.1 -- 11.6
debian-policy
Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Joey Hess
Bug#97755: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Bas Zoetekouw
Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Charles Briscoe-Smith
Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Bug#97755: [AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system
Joey Hess
Processed: [AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#97755 acknowledged by developer ([AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Joey Hess
Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Raul Miller
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Adam Heath
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Alexander Hvostov
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Raul Miller
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Raul Miller
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Raul Miller
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anton Zinoviev
Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Anton Zinoviev
Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system
Richard Braakman
CVS jdg: * Finished chapter 11
debian-policy
91252 accepted
Branden Robinson
Processed: 91252 accepted
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities
Adrian Bunk
Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities
Adam Di Carlo
Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities
Arto Jantunen
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Adrian Bunk
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Chris Waters
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Anthony Towns
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Peter Palfrader
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Julian Gilbey
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Anthony Towns
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Julian Gilbey
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Ben Collins
Bug#87510: I second this proposal
Julian Gilbey
Processed: policy proposal cleanup
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Processed: policy proposal cleanup
Julian Gilbey
Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Herbert Xu
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Arthur Korn
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Arthur Korn
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Julian Gilbey
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Arthur Korn
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Arthur Korn
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Patrik Hagglund
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Steve Greenland
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Patrik Hagglund
Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh
Zack Weinberg
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Chris Waters
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Anthony Towns
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Matthew Palmer
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Julian Gilbey
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Chris Waters
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Thomas Smith
Re: Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Edward C. Lang
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Thomas Smith
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Anthony Towns
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Julian Gilbey
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Chris Waters
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Anthony Towns
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Chris Waters
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Anthony Towns
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Arthur Korn
Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us
Raul Miller
[no subject]
John
Processed: has two seconds
Debian Bug Tracking System
#91257 accepted
Branden Robinson
Processed: #91257 accepted
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#66023: accepted!
Josip Rodin
Processed: accepted!
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#72335: Does debhelper handle build-indep ?
Peter S Galbraith
Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Bug#72335: [PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Debian Bug Tracking System
CVS jdg: * Clarification of package priority issues vis-a-vis the X Windows
debian-policy
[rusty@rustcorp.com.au: [ANNOUNCE] FHS 2.2 Released]
Julian Gilbey
CVS jdg: * Plug-ins != shared libraries (at last) closes: Bug#66023
debian-policy
New user Debian
bill
Bug#98712: Obscure Perl Policy
Raul Miller
Bug#98712: [PROPOSAL] Bug#98712: Obscure Perl Policy
Raul Miller
Bug#98712: PROPOSAL] Obscure Perl Policy
Brendan O'Dea
Bug#98712: PROPOSAL] Obscure Perl Policy
Raul Miller
Bug#98712: marked as done (Obscure Perl Policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: reopening
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Cesar Eduardo Barros
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Anthony Towns
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Cesar Eduardo Barros
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Brian May
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Fumitoshi UKAI
Re: Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Roland Mas
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Cesar Eduardo Barros
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Joey Hess
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Joey Hess
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Christian Kurz
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Cesar Eduardo Barros
Bug#99324: Default charset should be UTF-8
Marco d'Itri
mandate ldconfig -X?
Robert Bihlmeyer
Re: mandate ldconfig -X?
Herbert Xu
The last update was on 07:49 GMT Sat Mar 08. There are 349 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc