debian-policy Mar 2001 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: should vs must
Manoj Srivastava
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: should vs must
Julian Gilbey
Re: should vs must
Julian Gilbey
Re: should vs must
Anthony Towns
Re: should vs must
Julian Gilbey
Re: should vs must
Anthony Towns
Re: should vs must
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Josip Rodin
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Kai Henningsen
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Josip Rodin
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Kai Henningsen
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Josip Rodin
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Gergely Nagy
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Kai Henningsen
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Gergely Nagy
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Richard Braakman
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Kai Henningsen
Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#72335: ACCEPTED 31/10/2000] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Julian Gilbey
Bug#72335: ACCEPTED 31/10/2000] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
Julian Gilbey
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
Josip Rodin
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
Anthony Towns
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
Anthony Towns
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88249: [PROPOSAL] policy process must explicitly include relevant package maintainers
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88249: PROPOSAL] policy process must explicitly include relevant package maintainers
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Anthony Towns
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Anthony Towns
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Josip Rodin
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Anthony Towns
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Josip Rodin
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Kai Henningsen
Re: Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#87510: PROPOSAL] Make build dependencies a MUST
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88058: PROPOSAL] ftp-client virtual package
Julian Gilbey
Bug#88058: PROPOSAL] ftp-client virtual package
Herbert Xu
Policy decision about override file in debauch
Jérôme Marant
Re: Policy decision about override file in debauch
Richard Braakman
Re: Policy decision about override file in debauch
Jérôme Marant
Re: Policy decision about override file in debauch
Richard Braakman
Re: Policy decision about override file in debauch
Jérôme Marant
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#88111: policy should not dictate implementation details
Debian Bug Tracking System
Package documentation
Oliver Elphick
Re: Package documentation
Anthony Towns
Re: Package documentation
Oliver Elphick
Re: Package documentation
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Package documentation
Oliver Elphick
Re: Package documentation
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Package documentation
Henrique M Holschuh
Re: Package documentation
Richard Braakman
Re: Package documentation
Henrique M Holschuh
Re: Package documentation
Steve Greenland
Re: Package documentation
Nicolás Lichtmaier
Re: Package documentation
Richard Braakman
Re: Package documentation
Sam Hartman
Re: Package documentation
Ben Collins
Re: Package documentation
Anthony Towns
Re: Package documentation
Ben Collins
Re: Package documentation
Brian May
Re: Package documentation
Seth Arnold
Re: Package documentation
Anthony Towns
Re: Package documentation
Ben Collins
Re: Package documentation
Richard Braakman
Re: Package documentation
Anthony Towns
Re: Package documentation
Julian Gilbey
Re: Package documentation
Manoj Srivastava
How to do -dbg packages right?
Kai Henningsen
Bug#53582: let's get rid of this one at last
Yann Dirson
Bug#88651: debian-policy: Section 3.2 refers to packaging manual
C.M. Connelly
Bug#88651: debian-policy: Section 3.2 refers to packaging manual
Julian Gilbey
Re: seeking resolution to issues I have raised
Colin Watson
Re: seeking resolution to issues I have raised
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: seeking resolution to issues I have raised
idalton
Bug#88788: debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice
Colin Watson
Bug#88788: debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice
Robb Kidd
Bug#88788: debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice
Colin Watson
Bug#88788: debian-policy: Typo in copyright notice
Robb Kidd
Processed: Forgot to cc control
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: reassign for discussion and closure
Debian Bug Tracking System
what are shared libs and what are not ...
Othmar Pasteka
Re: what are shared libs and what are not ...
Ben Collins
Re: what are shared libs and what are not ...
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: what are shared libs and what are not ...
Ben Collins
Re: Bug#83924: upgrading-checklist.text should mention DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS specifically
Branden Robinson
Bug#87828: PROPOSAL] Deprecate confusing Build-Depends arch syntax
Branden Robinson
Bug#83977: Don't modules need a versioned perl/perl-base dependency?
Roderick Schertler
Bug#89039: menu-policy is all but useless
Frank Belew
Bug#86507: Progress?
Taral
Bug#86507: Progress?
Julian Gilbey
the math section should really be science
Drew Parsons
Re: the math section should really be science
Brian Russo
Re: the math section should really be science
Alexander Hvostov
Re: the math section should really be science
Brian Russo
Re: the math section should really be science
Egon Willighagen
Re: the math section should really be science
Josip Rodin
Re: the math section should really be science
Peter S Galbraith
Bug#89360: Science section not listed in http://packages.debian.org/unstable/
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: the math section should really be science
Josip Rodin
Re: the math section should really be science
Drew Parsons
Re: the math section should really be science
Julian Gilbey
Re: the math section should really be science
Josip Rodin
Re: the math section should really be science
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: the math section should really be science
Drew Parsons
Re: the math section should really be science
Josip Rodin
Where to place images?
Tollef Fog Heen
Re: Where to place images?
Matt Zimmerman
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#89038: the informatoion in the manpage should be in policy
Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: PostgreSQL 7.1beta5 debs available
Oliver Elphick
Crypto (Was: Re: PostgreSQL 7.1beta5 debs available)
"Jürgen A. Erhard"
Policy does not speak of translated man pages
Martin Quinson
Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages
Colin Watson
architecture-specific man pages (was Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages)
Manfred Wassmann
Re: architecture-specific man pages (was Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages)
Colin Watson
Re: architecture-specific man pages (was Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages)
Manfred Wassmann
Re: Policy does not speak of translated man pages
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#89473: [PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Ben Gertzfield
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Ben Gertzfield
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Ben Gertzfield
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Anthony Towns
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Anthony Towns
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Herbert Xu
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Ben Gertzfield
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Steve Greenland
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#89473: PROPOSAL] dpkg-statoverride and Conflicts: suidmanager (<< 0.50)
Ben Gertzfield
Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10
Julian Gilbey
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10
Julian Gilbey
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10
Julian Gilbey
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Policy rewrite: chaps 7-10
Herbert Xu
Re: Bug#89637: exim_tidydb crashes
Joey Hess
Bug#89674: [PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage
Herbert Xu
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage
Joey Hess
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage
Herbert Xu
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage
Julian Gilbey
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage
Herbert Xu
Bug#89674: PROPOSAL] Clarify ldconfig usage
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Proposal accepted
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#89807: packaging-manual still refers to /usr/doc
Adrian Bunk
Bug#89807: marked as done (packaging-manual still refers to /usr/doc)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#89867: [PROPOSED] Where to place web-accessible images
Tollef Fog Heen
[control] continuation lines on relation fields ?
Cyrille Chepelov
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ?
Cyrille Chepelov
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ?
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ?
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ?
Branden Robinson
Re: [control] continuation lines on relation fields ?
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#90287: [PROPOSAL] require the use of $MAIL
Arthur Korn
Bug#90287: PROPOSAL] require the use of $MAIL
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#90287: PROPOSAL] require the use of $MAIL
Brian May
Bug#90287: PROPOSAL] require the use of $MAIL
Arthur Korn
Processed: your mail
Debian Bug Tracking System
<Possible follow-ups>
Processed: your mail
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#53849: Processed: your mail
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#53849: Processed: your mail
Arthur Korn
Bug#53849: sorry for closing
Arthur Korn
Bug#90287: Retraction -- my understanding of $MAIL was seriously flawed
Arthur Korn
Processed: Retraction -- my understanding of $MAIL was seriously flawed
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#78014: .
FV21FV67
Bug#90511: [proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Branden Robinson
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Branden Robinson
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Steve Greenland
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Julian Gilbey
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Brian Russo
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Steve Greenland
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Brian May
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Santiago Vila
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
AndreasSchulz
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Santiago Vila
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Santiago Vila
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Marcelo E. Magallon
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
James Troup
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Julian Gilbey
Bug#90511: proposal] addressing objections (re: disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Herbert Xu
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Marcus Brinkmann
Bug#90511: marked as done ([proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#90511: new-proposal] (was disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Ben Collins
Bug#90511: new-proposal] (was disallow multi-distribution uploads)
Steve Greenland
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Anthony Towns
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Brian May
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Brian May
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Branden Robinson
Bug#90511: proposal] disallow multi-distribution uploads
Julian Gilbey
Bug#90511: An alternative solution to old libraries problem
Herbert Xu
Processed: email address going away
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: whoops
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#87711: PROPOSAL] Clarification of example configuration files
Manoj Srivastava
Bug#90989: [proposal] making all control fields multi-line
Cyrille Chepelov
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line
Cyrille Chepelov
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line
Julian Gilbey
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#90989: proposal] making all control fields multi-line
Julian Gilbey
Bug#91249: [PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Branden Robinson
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Anthony Towns
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Branden Robinson
Message not available
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Branden Robinson
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Santiago Vila
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Marcelo E. Magallon
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Josip Rodin
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Julian Gilbey
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Bob Hilliard
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Branden Robinson
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Anthony Towns
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Marcelo E. Magallon
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Peter Palfrader
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Colin Watson
Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Branden Robinson
Re: Bug#91249: PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
Arthur Korn
Slightly OT, graphing package dependencies
Gordon Sadler
Bug#91252: [PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
Branden Robinson
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
Julian Gilbey
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
Brian Russo
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
Branden Robinson
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
Brian Russo
Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
Steve Greenland
Processed: reassign
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Anthony Towns
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Anthony Towns
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Anthony Towns
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
Branden Robinson
packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy)
Seth Arnold
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy)
Anthony Towns
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy)
Seth Arnold
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy)
Jason Henry Parker
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy)
Anthony Towns
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy)
Steve Greenland
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy)
Anthony Towns
Re: packages affected list for must changes to policy (was: Re: Bug#91257: [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy)
Steve Greenland
Bug#91259: [PROPOSED] minor changes to app-defaults policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#91259: PROPOSED] minor changes to app-defaults policy
Marcelo E. Magallon
Bug#91260: [PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS
Branden Robinson
Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS
Marcelo E. Magallon
Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS
Josip Rodin
Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS
Branden Robinson
Bug#91260: PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS
Josip Rodin
Bug#91260: Clarification: reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS
Branden Robinson
Bug#91260: Clarification: reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS
Marcelo E. Magallon
Bug#91261: [PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
Julian Gilbey
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
Steve Greenland
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
Steve Greenland
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
Branden Robinson
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
Gerd Knorr
Bug#91261: PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Bug#91276: [PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Anthony Towns
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Josip Rodin
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Julian Gilbey
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Anthony Towns
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Julian Gilbey
Message not available
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Julian Gilbey
Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Branden Robinson
Re: Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#91276: PROPOSED 2001/03/25] update policy to match new serious severity
Branden Robinson
Bug#83072: marked as done ([PROPOSED] tightening up the ban on /usr/X11R6 in packages)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#91260: seconded
hmh
Bug#91261: seconded
hmh
Bug#91259: seconded
hmh
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Henrique M Holschuh
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Anthony Towns
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Anthony Towns
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Branden Robinson
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Anthony Towns
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Bob Hilliard
Bug#91257: seconded, in one condition
Branden Robinson
these proposals becoming amendments
Branden Robinson
Processed: these proposals becoming amendments
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#91276: make amendment
Anthony Towns
Processed: make amendment
Debian Bug Tracking System
where are valid sections defined?
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: where are valid sections defined?
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: where are valid sections defined?
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Re: where are valid sections defined?
Josip Rodin
Re: TrueType and non-free X fonts?
Branden Robinson
Re: TrueType and non-free X fonts?
Colin Watson
Processed: 91261 becoming an amendment
Debian Bug Tracking System
forgot to upgrade severities
Branden Robinson
Processed: forgot to upgrade severities
Debian Bug Tracking System
[btb@debian.org: Re: lintian and plugins, again]
Bradley Bell
parallel build options in source packages
Taral
Re: parallel build options in source packages
Julian Gilbey
Re: parallel build options in source packages
Taral
Re: parallel build options in source packages
Richard Braakman
Re: parallel build options in source packages
Taral
Re: parallel build options in source packages
Richard Braakman
Re: parallel build options in source packages
Taral
Re: parallel build options in source packages
Josip Rodin
Re: parallel build options in source packages
idalton
Bug#92071: packaging manual need documentation about multi-binary packages.
Sven LUTHER
Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Mark amendment
Debian Bug Tracking System
arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture)
Brian Russo
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture)
Brian Russo
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture)
Brian May
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture)
Arthur Korn
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture)
Brian Russo
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture)
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: arch: lines, for not-just-linux debian. (was Re: Hurd and architecture)
Arthur Korn
CVS jdg: * No longer install fsstnd
debian-policy
The last update was on 15:03 GMT Sat May 11. There are 393 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc