Re: non-consensus on debug (-g) policy
Ok, first point: I have been accused of objecting to this proposal.
I did no such thing. I offered some comments. That was all.
Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:
> What matters most, is that there was a consenus, the proposal has
> already been forwarded to debian-policy. Bringing this up now, after
> the discussion period is already over, is somewhat useless.
Second point: I seem to remember there being two separate possible
proposals here. There was, basically, consensus that we wanted one or
the other, but opinion seemed to be split about fifty-fifty between
the two. I think we still need to resolve which of the two we want.
Yes, we have consensus of sorts, but I don't think we can really close
the discussion on this till we've worked out the details. The devil's
in the details. :-)
I vote for proposal one, if it matters.
cheers
--
Chris Waters xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
Reply to: