debian-policy Apr 1999 by thread

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Brederlow
- Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Gordon Matzigkeit
  - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Brian May
    - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Marcus Brinkmann
    - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Raul Miller
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Brian May
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Aaron Van Couwenberghe
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Ed Boraas
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Brian May
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Daniel Martin
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Brian May
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Brian May
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Marcus Brinkmann
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Marcus Brinkmann
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Marcus Brinkmann
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Timothy Baldwin
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Richard Braakman
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Brian May
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Richard Braakman
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Marcus Brinkmann
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Brian May
    - Re: Debian GNU [was: smarter way to differ architectures needed?] Gordon Matzigkeit
    - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Brederlow
  - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Brederlow
    - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Brian May
    - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Brederlow
- Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Marcus Brinkmann
  - Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Brederlow
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: smarter way to differ architectures needed? Joey Hess
Policy about library package names Pedro Guerreiro
general method to set the $PATH Marco d'Itri
- Re: general method to set the $PATH Dragon
- Re: general method to set the $PATH Brian May
  - Re: general method to set the $PATH Michael Stone
Cross-compilers Santiago Vila
- Re: Cross-compilers Steve Greenland
- Re: Cross-compilers Joey Hess
  - Re: Cross-compilers Martin Mitchell
    - Re: Cross-compilers Joey Hess
    - Re: Cross-compilers Marcus Brinkmann
    - Re: Cross-compilers Joey Hess
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cross-compilers Martin Mitchell
Making the Info system FHS-compliant Santiago Vila
- Re: Making the Info system FHS-compliant Fabrizio Polacco
  - Re: Making the Info system FHS-compliant Santiago Vila
- Re: Making the Info system FHS-compliant Santiago Vila
- Re: Making the Info system FHS-compliant Steve Greenland
  - Re: Making the Info system FHS-compliant Santiago Vila
Bug#28747: [PROPOSED] GPL moved to /usr/share/common-licenses Santiago Vila
- Bug#28747: PROPOSED] GPL moved to /usr/share/common-licenses Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
  - Bug#28747: PROPOSED] GPL moved to /usr/share/common-licenses Greg Stark
    - Bug#28747: PROPOSED] GPL moved to /usr/share/common-licenses Santiago Vila
Pointing to UNIX98 standards from some doc Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#35655: Grub package violates filesystem standard Steve Dunham
- Re: Bug#35655: Grub package violates filesystem standard Darren O. Benham
  - Re: Bug#35655: Grub package violates filesystem standard Gordon Matzigkeit
wrt cross compilers and fhs Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Bug#34223: Bug #34223: APT removes essential packages. Jason Gunthorpe
- Processed: Re: Bug#34223: Bug #34223: APT removes essential packages. Debian Bug Tracking System
- Re: Bug#34223: Bug #34223: APT removes essential packages. Enrique Zanardi
  - Re: Bug#34223: Bug #34223: APT removes essential packages. Santiago Vila
    - Re: Bug#34223: Bug #34223: APT removes essential packages. Jason Gunthorpe
    - Re: Bug#34223: APT removes essential packages. Santiago Vila
Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Santiago Vila
- Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Johnie Ingram
  - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Enrique Zanardi
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Wichert Akkerman
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Enrique Zanardi
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Scott K. Ellis
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Enrique Zanardi
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Hartmut Koptein
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Ben Gertzfield
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Scott K. Ellis
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Ben Gertzfield
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Santiago Vila
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Michael Stone
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Tim Moore
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Wichert Akkerman
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Joseph Carter
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Wichert Akkerman
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Joseph Carter
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Wichert Akkerman
  - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Enrique Zanardi
- Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Joseph Carter
  - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Hamish Moffatt
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Fabrizio Polacco
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Joseph Carter
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Remco Blaakmeer
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Joseph Carter
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Hamish Moffatt
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? J.H.M. Dassen
  - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Miquel van Smoorenburg
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Santiago Vila
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Remco Blaakmeer
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Hamish Moffatt
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Joseph Carter
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Wichert Akkerman
    - /var/mail vs. /var/spool/mail Joseph Carter
    - Re: /var/mail vs. /var/spool/mail Fabrizio Polacco
    - Re: /var/mail vs. /var/spool/mail Joel Klecker
    - Re: /var/mail vs. /var/spool/mail Joseph Carter
    - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Miquel van Smoorenburg
  - Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Michael Stone
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Are /cdrom and /floppy really forbidden by policy? Santiago Vila
Re: Bug#35510: mirror license seems Debian-specific Santiago Vila
- Processed: Re: Bug#35510: mirror license seems Debian-specific Debian Bug Tracking System
- Bug#35510: mirror license seems Debian-specific Dirk Eddelbuettel
FWD: Re: BOA was: An issue with Apache on Debian Joey Hess
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BOA was: An issue with Apache on Debian Martin Stjernholm
  - Re: BOA was: An issue with Apache on Debian Galen Hancock
[PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Joey Hess
- Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Raphael Hertzog
- Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Joseph Carter
- Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Branden Robinson
- Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Wichert Akkerman
  - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Joey Hess
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Chris Waters
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Joey Hess
- Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Peter S Galbraith
  - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Joey Hess
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Chris Waters
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Joey Hess
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Laurent Martelli
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Carl R. Witty
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Laurent Martelli
    - Debian Menus (Was: Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Juergen A. Erhard
    - Re: Debian Menus (Was: Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) David Starner
    - Re: Debian Menus (Was: Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Juergen A. Erhard
    - Re: Debian Menus (Was: Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Michael Bramer
    - Re: Debian Menus (Was: Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Juergen A. Erhard
    - Re: Debian Menus (Was: Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Michael Bramer
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Brederlow
  - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Marcus Brinkmann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Fabien Ninoles
  - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Peter S Galbraith
    - Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy Brederlow
New Menu hierarchy (was Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Fabien Ninoles
/etc/init.d scripts Brock Rozen
- Re: /etc/init.d scripts Roderick Schertler
  - Re: /etc/init.d scripts Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts Steve Greenland
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts Anthony Towns
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts Raul Miller
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts Brock Rozen
- Re: /etc/init.d scripts Jean Charles Delepine
  - Re: /etc/init.d scripts Brock Rozen
[PROPOSED] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Joey Hess
- Re: [PROPOSED] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Branden Robinson
- Re: [PROPOSED] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Santiago Vila
- Re: [PROPOSED] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Raphael Hertzog
/etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Brock Rozen
- Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Anthony Towns
  - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Anthony Towns
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Brock Rozen
    - Scripts PROPOSAL Brock Rozen
    - Re: Scripts PROPOSAL Anthony Towns
    - Re: Scripts PROPOSAL Brock Rozen
    - Re: Scripts PROPOSAL Raul Miller
    - Re: Scripts PROPOSAL Brock Rozen
    - Re: Scripts PROPOSAL Raul Miller
    - Re: Scripts PROPOSAL Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Raul Miller
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Raul Miller
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Raul Miller
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Raul Miller
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Steve Greenland
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Steve Greenland
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Brock Rozen
    - Re: /etc/init.d scripts WAS: Re: start-stop-daemon on Debian (fwd) Steve Greenland
Bug#36286: debian-policy: bad link Julian Gilbey
RFC: amandment to policy (was: purging - what should be deleted ?) Christian Hammers
- Re: RFC: amandment to policy (was: purging - what should be deleted ?) Oliver Elphick
Re: Package Dependencies Brederlow
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Package Dependencies Fabien Ninoles
Re: Debian Menus (Was: Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Fabien Ninoles
- Re: Debian Menus (Was: Re: [PROPOSED] moving the menu hierarchy into debian policy) Juergen A. Erhard
Debian Quality Assurance Group Josip Rodin
Re: collect debian-admintools Michael Bramer
The i386 ABI? Lauri Alanko
- Re: The i386 ABI? Gordon Matzigkeit
Base packages Sami Dalouche
- Re: Base packages Laurent Martelli
  - Re: Base packages Guy Maor
- Re: Base packages Aaron Van Couwenberghe
- Re: Base packages Branden Robinson
contrib Sami Dalouche
- Re: contrib mike shupp
  - Re: contrib Remco Blaakmeer
    - Re: contrib Manoj Srivastava
[AMENDMENT] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Joey Hess
- Re: [AMENDMENT] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Manoj Srivastava
  - Re: [AMENDMENT] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Joey Hess
    - Re: [AMENDMENT] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Bob Hilliard
- Processed: [AMENDMENT] fixing nntpserver inconsitency Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Debian Bug Tracking System
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Processed: Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#29408: Old FSSTND in debian-policy package Manoj Srivastava
- Message not available
  - Bug#29408: marked as done ([PROPOSED] Update the version of FSSTND in debian-policy package) Debian Bug Tracking System
    - Including the FHS in debian-policy (Was: Bug#29408) Julian Gilbey
    - Re: Including the FHS in debian-policy (Was: Bug#29408) Joseph Carter
    - Re: Including the FHS in debian-policy (Was: Bug#29408) Julian Gilbey
logrotation Balazs Scheidler
- Re: logrotation Brock Rozen
- Re: logrotation Raphael Hertzog
- Re: logrotation Brian Almeida
- Re: logrotation Marco d'Itri
  - Re: logrotation Manoj Srivastava
    - Re: logrotation Joey Hess
    - Re: logrotation Brock Rozen
Adminstrative changes, and the FHS Manoj Srivastava
What exactly is allowed in the PAGER variable? Santiago Vila
- Processed: What exactly is allowed in the PAGER variable? Debian Bug Tracking System
Grades of stable-ness [was: GNOME --> potato: let's do it!] James Mastros
- Re: Grades of stable-ness [was: GNOME --> potato: let's do it!] Ossama Othman
- Re: Grades of stable-ness [was: GNOME --> potato: let's do it!] Charles C. Fu

The last update was on 07:47 GMT Sat Mar 08. There are 236 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc