Re: awk: essential virtual package?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 9 Feb 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Can we have essential virtual packages? I was under the
> impression that to do so one made a real essential package depend on
> the said virtual package (which descibes the current situation).
Exactly, the issue here is whether we should make base-files to depend on
awk or not.
Somebody told me there was an agreement to do that, and I believed it, so
I changed base-files. However, now I'm unable to find the discussion in
the archives. Perhaps it took place before December 1996 (when I joined
Debian).
Does somebody remembers this discussion?
[ If not, I will remove awk from the Depends line, of course ].
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNN9r0iqK7IlOjMLFAQHaQQP+P5KeSi1xoM463QoyFQHBpsH10xhT5581
FNzcpIYaRjewctLxft3NAusqNlkfyiqeyLQffhmLVXKuRt8P/R3ZbSEchUbXKgM8
RMtg87UVpNGE03RXSYSGUivpSye9Xe8UiCgglKFcQFNDDrSZMBtbuWhaWQhW0Rds
CAQbjUV/wqc=
=z5Sr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: