Re: need input: essential packages and pre-depends
Santiago Vila wrote:
> From the list, I can see just one exception: procps
> procps was essential in Debian 1.3.1, but it is not essential in hamm.
> procps contains the important /bin/ps binary (which is certainly used in
> maintainer scripts, either directly or indirectly through the init.d
Important but not essential.
A quick grep on /etc/init.d/* shows no use of ps for the packages I use.
> Is there a reason why this package lost his essential flag?
This was discussed in debian-devel about 3 months ago, the consensus was
it is not essential. Neither was psmisc.
> If nobody objects, I will report this as a bug, and will ask the
> maintainer to use a Pre-Depends field for libc6 (which is the only
I object, unless there is a clear decision on this mail list that it should
Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
|@work: email@example.com, @play: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|@home: email@example.com, @debian:firstname.lastname@example.org|
|@web: http://www.triode.net.au/~csmall @spam:root@localhost|
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org