Le Saturday 7 July 2012 01:07:44, gregor herrmann a écrit : > > Personally, I would recommend keeping > > [debhelper versioned dependency], but IIRC Jonas and I have had > > this argument before. :) > > hihi > > i also prefer to keep it but maybe C::M could at least not add it if > it's not there but keep it if it's there? ok. that's what I'll implement except when debian/compat is '9'. In this case, cme will "fix" debhelper dep so as to have debhelper >= 9 Is this fine ? All the best Dominique
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.