Hi, This probably is a stupid question, but still I feel a bit safer asking, although I've acted on my own opinion once or twice already - hope I haven't stepped on many toes :) Apparently, some of the changelog editing tools may add two sections for the same author in the same changelog entry if somebody else has written something else in the meantime; cf. the libimage-librsvg-perl changelog at rev. 60795. Is it okay for other team members to consolidate the entries in later updates, as I've done in rev. 67659 with the changelog of libhttp-request-params-perl? Or is there a reason people would want two stanzas in the changelog? Again, sorry if I'm wasting everyone's time with a stupid question :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev email@example.com roam@FreeBSD.org firstname.lastname@example.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence claims to be an Epimenides paradox, but it is lying.
Description: Digital signature