On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:01:05 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > I can bring this up on the perl5-porters list, but I'd like to get some > more input first, particularly from oldtimers like Brendan :) Assuming > upstream relations work out OK, are there other reasons why a more > fine grained split would be a bad idea? I assume it's more work to deal with more perl-* packages than we have at the moment but that's your call :) For lib.*-perl package it might be a bit annoying having to find out in which of the packages a dependency is. (Unless we can still use a dependency on a main "perl" package that pulls in all of its siblings and the rest is an internal implementation detail of the perl source package.) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Pink Floyd: Is There Anybody Out There?
Description: Digital signature