Re: Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)
010 21:04, Joel Roth <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:13:44AM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> On 0, Ansgar Burchardt <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > I see two possible solutions to include the RC bug fix in Squeeze:
>> > a) Allow both nama/1.064-1 and the (new) libaudio-ecasound-perl to
>> > migrate to testing. However I guess the release team is not happy about
>> > including new packages at this point.
>> > b) Preparing a -2 revision of nama that drops the new Recommends and
>> > allowing it to migrate.
>> I'd prefer the latter. It would also be nice to document changes in the
>> changelog files so that ignorant people like me know why that $package
>> has been recommanded.
> Okay, I'll go this route.
I've uploaded this.
Tim Retout <firstname.lastname@example.org>