Re: Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)
On 0, Ansgar Burchardt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I see two possible solutions to include the RC bug fix in Squeeze:
> a) Allow both nama/1.064-1 and the (new) libaudio-ecasound-perl to
> migrate to testing. However I guess the release team is not happy about
> including new packages at this point.
> b) Preparing a -2 revision of nama that drops the new Recommends and
> allowing it to migrate.
I'd prefer the latter. It would also be nice to document changes in the
changelog files so that ignorant people like me know why that $package
has been recommanded.