Re: Perl 5.12 status update
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Our proposal would therefore be that we look again at the number and
> severity of outstanding issues related to moving to Perl 5.12 once the
> Python transition has finished and evaluate at that point whether it
> would be feasible to do so before freezing.
Unfortunately, it seems that we haven't been able to fit this transition
in for the squeeze release, so it looks like perl 5.12 will have to be
targetted at squeeze+1.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E