On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:56:39 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > In looking for the reasons for #590453, I wonder why we have the > unstable branch of Gtk2-Perl > packaged since the beginning of the month. Surely we should have Gtk2 > 1.222 and Glib 1.223, which are the latest stable branches from the > end of May? I guess because uscan told us about the new version without mentioning if it's "stable" or something else :) (And nobody of the people working on it noticed warnings or considered them dangerous enough to refrain from putting it into unstable ...). Thanks for looking into this problems! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #190: Proprietary Information.
Description: Digital signature