Re: Source package name mismatches in the repository
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 15:41, gregor herrmann <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:03:40 +0100, Chris Butler wrote:
>> Should we rename the directories in svn to match the source packages, to
>> stop confusing PET? Or should PET be handling this better?
> Ehm, no, we have deliberately renamed a couple of source packages so
> that they are all $source = $binary = libFOO-perl.
> Some of them are already uploaded, what we are seeing in PET now are
> the remaining ones.
> The simplest solution would therefore be to finally upload the
> remaining packages; of course additionally an improvement in PET
> wouldn't hurt :)
I'm surprised by this. PET should detect a directory/source name
mismatch, but still be able to track by source name, IIRC... I guess
I'll have to dive into de code (and have a surge of must-clean-this