Re: Bug#537296: Maintenance of libparams-util-perl
severity 537296 important
thanks
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:47 AM, gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> wrote:
> block 317518 with 537296
> block 531238 with 537296
> thanks
>
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:57:32 -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
>
>> Some months ago, I filed bug #537296, which requested an upgrade for
>> libparams-util-perl since one of the packages I'd like to upload is
>> blocked by it.
>
> Now there's another one: the newer version of libsql-statement-perl
> also needs Params::Util 1.00.
>
> Since libsql-statement-perl 1.22 fixes an RC bug a newer
> libparams-util-perl would be much appreciated.
Given this, I have now bumped the severity up to "important" and plan
to do a Non-Maintainer Upload after two weeks or so, perhaps in the
first week of November.
I think you deserve the benefit of the doubt, so I'll try to give you
more time in case you've just been out of contact for awhile or too
busy to upgrade it yourself. I think a NMU is an appropriate course of
action for now, short of totally hijacking the package from you. It
puzzles me that you have not yet responded to this bug report nor my
inquiry on debian-qa@l.d.o as to your MIA-status, given that the
version available in Debian (0.38) was released upstream on 16 Feb
2009.
Daniel: I'm sorry of this is just noise to you; who-uploads indicates
that you were the sponsor for the previous releases of this, so
perhaps you have some other way of getting in touch with Jonas and
letting him know of our plans, or if he has orphaned his Debian
package contributions.
>
> Cheers,
> gregor
>
> --
> .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06
> : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
> `. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
> `- NP: Eagles
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkrYa2cACgkQOzKYnQDzz+RcCgCfRZ8hr/nKArhvv1Xuh/4fnYhh
> iREAoKy+7MPqIHxYf+cH+JAxCBbhQ8ul
> =sW+H
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Reply to: