On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:59:46 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:18:29AM -0430, Jose Luis Rivas wrote: > >I do strongly believe that's best using simple ways of packaging as > >dh7 and that using CDBS is just adding extra complication in a package > >relatively easy. Please reconsider your petition. > I understand your concerns and respect them. I explicitly raised the > issue of CDBS sue when joining the Perl group, and back then it was > not considered a problem, but I will respect *if* the opinion of the > group has now changed. Hm, interesting silence regarding this question :) My opinion is that obviously hardly anybody wants to work on CDBS based packages but that they do no harm in the group/repo. I'm fine with having these packages here, and I don't mind ... > Nevertheless do not, however, drop the use of CDBS, ... reminding others every now and then about the fact that "Jonas' packages are special" :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Dire Straits: Six Blade Knife
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature