Re: Re: Sys::SigAction
2009/2/3 Damyan Ivanov <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
I moved the whole thing to the new proposed format. Dunno why I didn't
do it the first time.
> does "Consistent Signal Handling" really needs to be with capital
> first letters? I see upstream uses that too, but what should it mean?
> s/This module/Sys::SigAction/ ?
> there is an extra space before the short description
> Maintainer: should be set to the group and Uploaders: -- to you
Grrr. Of course.
> perhaps including the dbd-oracle-timeout.pod article somewhere as
> a doc would be useful?
> debian/rules uses dh7 features, debian/control b-depends on debhelper
> (>= 7), but debian/compat contains "5"
Thanks for your comments.
>> P.S. Is there any problem preparing packages depending on something in
>> the NEW queue?
> No. Building them in chroot is a bit tricky, but doable.
No doubt I would enforcing the trickiness on any sponsor as well...
The trouble is, with the current length of the NEW queue...