Re: dh-make-perl revamped (not really)
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Paul Fenwick <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> However if I can be so bold as to make a small suggestion, would you
> consider calling the module App::DhMakePerl or Debian::DhMakePerl?
> App::DhMakePerl in particular would follow existing naming conventions for
> modules which primarily contain application code.
(Whoops, i only replied to Paul initially, my bad)
Although I agree with your suggestion, I don't see any particularly
fatal issue with having "DhMakePerl" as the top-level namespace; it's
not like someone else is going to want to use it :)